Law Firm Directory

Register → OHDUI/DWI → № C68654

DS
Attorney at Law

Counsel of Record

Daniel
Sabol

 ·  Columbus, OH

Years at Bar
19
Law School
[]
Languages
English

Google Reviews

4.8/ 5.00

74 reviews on Google

19 client reviews

Initial consultation: free · 30 min
Response typically within 24 hours

§ 01 — Practice

Areas of practice

Credentials

Years in Practice
19 yrs
Law School
[]
Languages
English
Location
Columbus, OH
43206

Also listed on

§ 02 — Biography

Biography not yet provided. Claim this profile to add one.

Is this your listing?

Claim your free profile —
unlock more clients.

  • Add your full bio & photo
  • Respond to client reviews
  • Show your website & contact info
  • Appear higher in search results

Verified via ARDC bar records · Free tier available · No credit card required

§ 03 — Reviews

What clients have said.

Google

4.874 reviews

Avvo

Reviewed19 reviews

Google Reviews4.8★ · 74 total

See all 74 on Google →
★★★★★May 2026

Can’t say enough about both of these guys they are great at what they do. If you need their services you can’t go wrong. Highly recommended.

Alan FerrettiGoogle
★★★★★Apr 2026

Great lawyer. Lays everything out and fights for you 100%. He has great relationships with the judges and prosecutors. Nothing but professional. He wants all the evidence and guides you through the process to make sure you make the most educated decisions with your case. I would recommend him to anyone.

Mark PederzolliGoogle
☆☆☆☆Mar 2026

I wasted $5,000 on this chase Mallory for an assault case and it was one of the most frustrating experiences I’ve ever had. There was video footage, witnesses ready to testify, body cam evidence, and clear inconsistencies in the plaintiff’s story, yet almost none of it was properly used in court. Key witnesses were never called, and the plaintiff was barely challenged on obvious contradictions that should have been exposed during cross-examination. Jury selection felt careless and unstrategic, and the overall defense was incredibly weak considering the amount of evidence available. The only “trial prep” I got was about 45 minutes the day before trial, which should have been a major red flag. To make things worse, the lawyer seemed more focused on popping Zyns in his mouth in the courtroom than aggressively defending the case. Watching the trial unfold was frustrating because there were so many opportunities to challenge the narrative that were simply ignored. In the end, after spending thousands and having evidence that could have helped my case, it still resulted in a guilty verdict. Overall it felt like a completely wasted defense and a huge disappointment.

Moneyline clubGoogle

Avvo Reviews19 total

See profile on Avvo →
★★★★★
Sep 2018

Domestic Violence

TerriAvvo

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.